Published April 13, 2016 | Version v1
Dataset Restricted

Potsdam Commentary Corpus

  • 1. ROR icon University of Potsdam

Description

We present a revised and extended version of the Potsdam Commentary Corpus, a collection of 175 German newspaper commentaries (op-ed pieces) that has been annotated with syntax trees and three layers of discourse-level information: nominal coreference, connec- tives and their arguments (similar to the PDTB, (Prasad et al., 2008)), and trees reflecting discourse structure according to Rhetorical Structure Theory (Mann and Thompson, 1988). Connectives have been annotated with the help of a semi-automatic tool (Conano, (Stede and Heintze, 2004)) that identifies most connectives and suggests arguments based on their syntactic category. The other layers have been created manually with dedicated annotation tools. The corpus is made available on the one hand as a set of original XML files produced with the annotation tools, based on identical tokenization. On the other hand, it will be distributed together with the open-source linguistic database ANNIS3 (Chiarcos et al., 2008; Zeldes et al., 2009), which provides multi-layer search functionality and layer-specific visualization modules. This allows for comfortable qualitative evaluation of the correlations between annotation layers.

Abstract (English)

PCC 1.0: A corpus of German newspaper commentaries has been assembled and annotated with different information (and currently, to different degrees): part-of-speech, syntax, rhetorical structure, connectives, co-reference, and information structure. The paper explains the design decisions taken in the annotations, and describes a number of applications using this corpus with its multi-layer annotation.

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Additional details

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Informationsstruktur: Die sprachlichen Mittel der Gliederung von Äußerung, Satz und Text 5485900

Data quality

Accuracy

Not specified.

Completeness

Not specified.

Conformity

Not specified.

Consistency

Not specified.

Credibility

Not specified.

Processability

Not specified.

Relevance

Not specified.

Timeliness

Not specified.

Understandability

Not specified.