From theory to reality: Evaluating smallholder farmers' attitudes toward nature in Tanzania
Creators
Description
This paper contributes to the understanding of the value base of smallholder farmers' relationships with their environment. It aims to identify and analyze Tanzanian smallholder farmers' attitudes toward nature. The field was approached with a combined method, a content analysis of a body of literature and a qualitative study consisting of questionnaires and interviews with smallholder farmers as well as their representatives. The literature analysis revealed three different types of evaluative attitudes toward nature in texts representing smallholder farmers' opinions and values, and the issues affecting them. These include the Human benefit type, the Sustainable society type, and the Harmony type. The results show that there is a discrepancy among the literature analysis, the answers of smallholder farmers, and those of their representatives. The Harmony type is not mentioned in the answers of the smallholder farmers themselves and is only marginally in those of their representatives but is present in the literature. This finding is discussed from the perspective of the rights of nature as an entry point. Additionally, possible reasons for Tanzanian NGOs to include 'foreign' ideas, such as the Harmony type, in their agendas are discussed. Since Tanzanian smallholder farmers' evaluative attitudes toward nature are best represented by the Sustainable society type, policy strategies that support agroecology could be used to give them the mental and physical space of opportunity they need.
Files
Schopp_2023.pdf
Files
(1.6 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:9b75455a3146e3d31685be8e80b54bca
|
1.6 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Funding
- Bundesministerium für Forschung, Technologie und Raumfahrt
Data quality
- Accuracy
-
does not apply
- Completeness
-
The published article is provided in its completeness.
- Conformity
-
The manuscript has been deemed conform to Elsevier's publications standards.
- Consistency
-
The arguments presented in the manuscript are self-consistent.
- Credibility
-
The manuscript has been vetted by Peer-review.
- Processability
-
does not apply
- Relevance
-
The submitted manuscript has high relevance in the field of environmental ethics, agricultural visions, Tanzanian smallholder farmers, evaluative attitudes towards nature, and Sustainable Development. The manuscript has been published by Social Sciences & Humanities Open.
- Timeliness
-
The submitted manuscript contributes to questions of weak and strong sustainability and their geographical bias.
- Understandability
-
The published articleis presented in such a way that it should be understood by the wider academic community.