Ethics of Bioeconomy: Disagreement about Good Life and Distribution of Risks
Description
This working paper presents the results from the Working Package 1.1. of BATATA. The goal of this sub-package was to identify and to analyze ethical conflicts arising from Bioeconomy policy strategies adapted by governments in several countries of the Global North.
Files
20210525_DisagreementBioeconomy_v8_WorkingPaper_REpository.pdf
Files
(447.5 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:0122762ec6462aa3adf92c813171e4ff
|
447.5 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Data quality
- Accuracy
-
The data used for the ethical analysis -- selected Bioeconomy policy strategies from countries of the Global North -- represent typical cases of Bioeconomy strategies from the Global North. The selected policy papers have been used as case studies representing paradigmatic examples for types of Bioeconomy strategies distinguished in the literature.
- Completeness
-
The data analyzed for this working paper does not claim to be complete, the analysis was based on selected cases.
- Conformity
-
The dataset analyzed in this study conforms to established standards and guidelines for data collection and analysis aiming at identification of ethical controversies.
- Consistency
-
does not apply
- Credibility
-
The dataset used for the analysis is credible in terms of its source and reliability.
- Processability
-
does not apply
- Relevance
-
The dataset analyzed in this study is highly relevant for the research topic as it represents paradigmatic examples of types of Bioeconomy policy strategies which have been distinguished in the literature.
- Timeliness
-
The dataset was collected in 2020.
- Understandability
-
The dataset is easy to understand; the paper presents interpretation of the results of the analysis.