Ethical Disagreements between Proponents of a Green-Growth-oriented and a Degrowth-oriented Bioeconomy Strategy
Description
The paper provides an analysis of ethical disagreements among proponents of a Green-Growth-oriented and a Degrowth-oriented Bioeconomy strategy.
Files
20220510_Degrowth-Bioeconomy-Justification-Reasonableness_v12-clean_Repository.pdf
Files
(205.9 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:d42b50da11fd663dcafc0ef4701f1538
|
205.9 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Is new version of
- Text: 10.57754/FDAT.8h7bx-0pt33 (DOI)
Data quality
- Accuracy
-
The data used for the ethical analysis -- selected Bioeconomy policy strategies from countries of the Global North -- represent typical cases of Bioeconomy strategies from the Global North. The selected policy papers have been used as case studies representing paradigmatic examples for types of Bioeconomy strategies distinguished in the literature.
- Completeness
-
The data analyzed for this working paper (Bioeconomy policy strategies) does not claim to be complete, the analysis was based on selected cases.
- Conformity
-
The dataset analyzed in this study conforms to established standards and guidelines for data collection and analysis of ethical controversies (identification of contradictory commitments and discussion of their reasonableness).
- Consistency
-
does not apply
- Credibility
-
The dataset used for the analysis is credible in terms of its source and reliability.
- Processability
-
does not apply
- Relevance
-
The dataset analyzed in this study is highly relevant for the research topic as it represents paradigmatic examples of types of Bioeconomy policy strategies which have been distinguished in the literature.
- Timeliness
-
The dataset was collected in 2020.
- Understandability
-
The dataset is easy to understand; the paper presents interpretation of the results of the analysis.